Side by side

Nokia FlowOne vs ONAP

Both stand on telecommunication service fulfillment software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

ONAP combines service design, lifecycle orchestration, and runtime automation in a modular open source platform. Its full deployment requirements are substantial, though selecting components can reduce them.

Visit ONAP

The facts

	Nokia FlowOne	ONAP
Free plan	Not published	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web
Lowest paid plan	Not published	Free or on request
Plans published	None	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	nokia.com	onap.org
On telecommunication service fulfillment software	#5 of 9	#1 of 9

Nokia FlowOne: what it does well

ONAP: what it does well

Supports physical, virtual, and cloud-native network functions.
Runtime includes monitoring and closed-loop automation.
Modular components let users select orchestration functions.
Role-based access serves design and operations personnel.
Published blueprints include 5G, VoLTE, and cross-domain VPN.

What to know first

Full deployment guide lists 224 GB RAM and 112 vCores.
Full deployment guide lists 160 GB disk.
Known issues and limitations are documented in project release notes.
Product support service is not described.

Alternatives to Nokia FlowOne Alternatives to ONAP The whole list