FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Nimble vs Shards

Both stand on package managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Nimble

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Nimble covers the main package workflow for Nim, from discovery and installation through development, testing, locking, and publication. Manual refreshes and external Git or Mercurial requirements are important operational details.

Visit Nimble

Shards

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Shards provides Crystal projects with dependency resolution, installation, locking, and build-related commands across three desktop platforms. Its decentralized model and Git-oriented sources fit teams managing dependencies directly in project files and repositories.

Visit Shards

The facts

NimbleShards
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitenim-lang.github.iogithub.com
On package managers#52 of 93#56 of 93

Nimble: what it does well

  • Free package manager for Nim
  • Supports local, Git, and Mercurial sources
  • Lockfile pins exact dependency versions
  • Includes build, run, test, and check commands
  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux

What to know first

  • Package lists do not update automatically
  • GitHub downloads require Git 2.22 or newer
  • Lockfile checksums currently support SHA-1

Shards: what it does well

  • Free plan with no listed charge
  • Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Supports Git and local dependency sources
  • Lockfile records selected dependency versions
  • Includes dependency override configuration

What to know first

  • Requires Crystal and libyaml to compile
  • Git libraries are expected to use v-prefixed tags
  • No central package registry

Alternatives to Nimble Alternatives to Shards The whole list