FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Muesli vs StackEdit

Both stand on markdown editors. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Muesli

Free plan APILinuxMac+3

Muesli combines Markdown editing, collaboration and agent participation with several storage choices. Its free open-source offering includes self-hosting, though durable self-hosted documents and history need Postgres and Redis.

Visit Muesli

StackEdit

Free plan Open source Web

StackEdit combines browser-based Markdown editing with offline access, collaboration, sync, and publishing workflows. It is listed as free and open source, with support for several Markdown variants and export formats.

Visit StackEdit

The facts

MuesliStackEdit
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedYes
Runs onAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsWeb
Lowest paid planFree or on requestFree or on request
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitemuesli.mdstackedit.io
On markdown editors#3 of 31#1 of 31

Muesli: what it does well

  • Live cursors and tracked suggestions support collaboration.
  • Agents can work through MCP or direct file edits.
  • Guest links provide three access roles without accounts.
  • Free and open source under AGPL-3.0.

What to know first

  • Durable self-hosted documents and history require Postgres and Redis.
  • The CLI installer is for macOS and Linux; Windows uses a ZIP.
  • Hosted service collects account, session and workspace data.

StackEdit: what it does well

  • Works offline and supports local files.
  • Merges simultaneous edits by collaborators.
  • Syncs with Google Drive, Dropbox, and GitHub.
  • Exports Markdown, HTML, and PDF.

What to know first

  • The product is described as an in-browser editor.
  • Copyright information displayed covers 2013–2019.
  • Its Markdown flavor is listed as custom.

Alternatives to Muesli Alternatives to StackEdit The whole list