Side by side
Millet vs Scribbl
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit Millet Free plan ExtensionMacWeb+1
Scribbl combines meeting capture with transcripts, notes, and optional automations across several meeting platforms. Free access is limited by monthly meeting count, while Pro starts at $13 a month when billed annually.
Visit ScribblThe facts
| Millet | Scribbl | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | Extension, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Pro: $13 a month |
| Plans published | None | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | scribbl.co |
| On ai meeting assistants | #55 of 82 | #15 of 82 |
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Scribbl: what it does well
- Records without a bot joining the call
- Supports Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams
- Transcribes in 88 languages
- Automations request approval before changing other tools
- Free plan allows 10 meetings per month
What to know first
- Free plan is limited to 10 meetings monthly
- Mac desktop requires Apple silicon M1 or newer
- Windows installer is not yet code-signed, according to the site
Alternatives to Millet Alternatives to Scribbl The whole list