Side by side
Millet vs Notta
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit Millet
Free plan AndroidExtensioniPhone+3
Notta combines meeting capture and file transcription with summaries, action items, and multiple export formats. The Free plan's per-conversation and monthly caps are important to weigh against the paid tiers.
Visit NottaThe facts
| Millet | Notta | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac | Android, Extension, iPhone, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Pro: $8.17 a month |
| Plans published | None | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Notta |
| Website | github.com | notta.ai |
| On ai meeting assistants | #55 of 82 | #3 of 82 |
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Notta: what it does well
- Supports 58 transcription languages.
- Captures meetings with or without a bot.
- Exports transcripts in five listed formats.
- Offers speaker labels and timestamps.
- Works across desktop, mobile, web, and Chrome.
What to know first
- Free conversations are limited to three minutes.
- Free plan allows 120 transcription minutes monthly.
- Free plan allows 10 AI summaries monthly.
- Pro starts at $8.17/user/mo billed annually.