FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Middleman vs Statiq

Both stand on static site generators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Middleman

Free plan LinuxMacWeb+1

Middleman provides a Ruby-based workflow for creating static sites, with extensible templates, localization, build commands, and deployment tooling. Its main limitation is that it is a generator rather than a primary Rack hosting solution, and the Rails Asset Pipeline is no longer in v4 core.

Visit Middleman

Statiq

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Statiq provides a modular .NET approach to static sites and documentation, with templates, deployment options, and extensibility. Users should review its runtime requirement and commercial-license conditions before adoption.

Visit Statiq

The facts

MiddlemanStatiq
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, Web, WindowsLinux, Mac, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedSee the plans
Plans publishedNone2
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitemiddlemanapp.comstatiq.dev
On static site generators#21 of 35#17 of 35

Middleman: what it does well

  • Free and open-source
  • Includes local preview server
  • Supports multiple template engines
  • Builds localized pages with i18n
  • Deployment supports rsync, FTP, SFTP, and Git

What to know first

  • Requires Ruby and RubyGems
  • Rack development hosting is not a primary use case
  • Rails Asset Pipeline was removed from v4 core
  • Future of Rails Asset Pipeline support is uncertain

Statiq: what it does well

  • Supports Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Offers more than 100 framework modules
  • Includes local preview server
  • Supports multiple template and data formats
  • Has a free plan

What to know first

  • Requires the .NET Core SDK
  • Runs inside a console application
  • Commercial license limits apply
  • Private-license support is not guaranteed

Alternatives to Middleman Alternatives to Statiq The whole list