Side by side
Merlin AI Code Review vs Mira
Both stand on ai code review tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted
Merlin offers self-hosted pull request review with configurable AI backends and security scanning. The software is free, but users arrange their own AI access and cover provider token charges.
Visit Merlin AI Code Review
Free plan Self-hostedWeb
Mira offers contextual reviews, security checks, and feedback-derived rules for teams prepared to self-host. Confirm that your code host is supported and account for direct model-provider costs.
Visit MiraThe facts
| Merlin AI Code Review | Mira | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Self-hosted | Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | merlin-review.com | miracode.ai |
| On ai code review tools | #15 of 47 | #19 of 47 |
Merlin AI Code Review: what it does well
- Posts inline comments at file and line level.
- Security checks include secret and dependency scanning.
- Supports five listed code-hosting services.
- Can use local Ollama embeddings and local Qdrant.
- MIT-licensed with no per-seat fee.
What to know first
- Users must supply an AI API key.
- AI provider token charges still apply.
- No Merlin server or account is provided.
- Offline setup is described using Ollama and local Qdrant.
Mira: what it does well
- Uses indexed project context beyond the diff
- Includes secret scanning and OSV package checks
- Supports GitHub, GitLab, and Forgejo
- Free plan includes all features
What to know first
- Self-hosting is the only deployment option
- Bitbucket support is planned, not available
- Users pay model-provider costs directly
Alternatives to Merlin AI Code Review Alternatives to Mira The whole list