Side by side
MeetGeek vs Millet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan AndroidiPhoneSelf-hosted
MeetGeek combines meeting capture with transcripts, summaries, and team features, and offers bot-free recording as well as bot capture. Check the storage allowances and meeting recording limits against your needs.
Visit MeetGeek Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit MilletThe facts
| MeetGeek | Millet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Self-hosted | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Pro: $15.99 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | meetgeek.ai | github.com |
| On ai meeting assistants | #11 of 82 | #55 of 82 |
MeetGeek: what it does well
- Bot-free and bot recording modes are available.
- Transcription supports more than 100 languages.
- Free plan includes three hours of monthly transcription.
- Customer data is not used to train external models.
What to know first
- Free Basic includes three months of transcript storage.
- Free Basic includes one month of audio storage.
- Business recordings have a three-hour per-meeting limit.
- Enterprise recordings have a four-hour per-meeting limit.
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Alternatives to MeetGeek Alternatives to Millet The whole list