FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

MedCalc vs rmcmc

Both stand on statistical analysis software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

MedCalc

Paid WindowsMacLinux

MedCalc combines statistical tests, regression, scripting, and broad file import support in a desktop package. Its paid licenses span individual users, concurrent network access, and site deployment.

Visit MedCalc

rmcmc

Free plan

rmcmc offers configurable MCMC sampling with adaptation, diagnostics-ready output, and optional Stan integration. Its usefulness depends on working in R and, for Stan workflows, installing BridgeStan’s interface.

Visit rmcmc

The facts

MedCalcrmcmc
Free planNoYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWindows, Mac, LinuxNot published
Lowest paid planSingle-user subscription: $179 a yearNot published
Plans published4None
MakerMedCalcNot published
Websitemedcalc.orggithub-pages.ucl.ac.uk
On statistical analysis software#93 of 106#89 of 106

MedCalc: what it does well

  • Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • Includes statistical tests and regression models
  • Supports scripting
  • Imports many listed file formats
  • Offers a 15-day trial

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Single-user subscription renews annually
  • Site license is $2,199 a year

rmcmc: what it does well

  • Free MIT-licensed R package
  • Four Metropolis-Hastings proposal types
  • Warm-up scale and shape adaptation
  • Optional warm-up traces and statistics
  • BridgeStan and Stan model integration

What to know first

  • Requires R and package installation
  • BridgeStan features require its R interface
  • Main-chain proposal settings stay fixed after warm-up
  • GitHub issues are the listed bug-report route

Alternatives to MedCalc Alternatives to rmcmc The whole list