Side by side
MatrixOne vs MySQL
Both stand on distributed sql databases. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hosted
Choose MatrixOne if you want a self-hosted MySQL-compatible database for transactional, analytical, vector, and full-text work, with Git-style data features and hybrid retrieval. Look elsewhere if you need a managed deployment or a published Enterprise Edition price.
Visit MatrixOne
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Visit MySQL The facts
| MatrixOne | MySQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | See the plans |
| Plans published | 2 | 18 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | matrixorigin.io | mysql.com |
| On distributed sql databases | #14 of 25 | #10 of 25 |
MatrixOne: what it does well
- Combines transactional, analytical, vector, and full-text workloads.
- Git-style snapshots, branches, merges, time travel, and rollback.
- Hybrid queries combine vector and text retrieval.
- Supports horizontal scaling and multi-region deployment.
- Offers logical and physical backup options.
What to know first
- The product is self-hosted.
- Enterprise Edition pricing is handled through sales.
MySQL: what it does well
Alternatives to MatrixOne Alternatives to MySQL The whole list