FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Magic Wormhole vs Plik

Both stand on file transfer services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Magic Wormhole

Free plan AndroidAPIiPhone+5

Magic Wormhole offers a focused, open-source transfer workflow with encrypted peer traffic and one-time codes. Its security documentation and relay limits should be considered when choosing how to use it.

Visit Magic Wormhole

Plik

Free plan APILinuxMac+3

Plik combines temporary sharing, configurable storage, authentication, encryption, and deployment choices in a free self-hosted project. Its hosting responsibility and documented MIME-detection limitation should be considered first.

Visit Plik

The facts

Magic WormholePlik
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroid, API, iPhone, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsAPI, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestNot published
Plans published1None
MakerMagic WormholeNot published
Websitegithub.comroot-gg.github.io
On file transfer services#39 of 105#35 of 105

Magic Wormhole: what it does well

  • Free MIT-licensed software
  • Single-use human-pronounceable codes
  • Encrypted peer traffic
  • Supports files, directories, text, and streams
  • Clients listed for major platforms

What to know first

  • No desktop app listed for the core project
  • Default codes have 16 bits of entropy
  • Public relay is intended for moderate traffic
  • Requires a mailbox server for initial messages

Plik: what it does well

  • Self-hosted file sharing
  • Provides web, API, and CLI access
  • Supports multiple storage backends
  • Offers client-side age encryption
  • Configurable expiration and one-shot downloads

What to know first

  • Requires self-hosted deployment
  • Server MIME detection can misidentify Office files
  • No desktop app

Alternatives to Magic Wormhole Alternatives to Plik The whole list