Side by side
Mackerel vs Tencent Cloud Monitor
Both stand on cloud monitoring. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxWeb+1
Mackerel combines host and service metrics with cloud and container monitoring options. Its free plan has clear limits on hosts, retention, rules, and dashboards; paid usage is listed from 2,180 JPY/mo.
Visit Mackerel Free plan Web
Visit Tencent Cloud Monitor The facts
| Mackerel | Tencent Cloud Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Web, Windows | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | mackerel.io | tencentcloud.com |
| On cloud monitoring | #7 of 23 | #22 of 23 |
Mackerel: what it does well
- Organizes monitored hosts into services and roles.
- Tracks user-defined service metrics.
- Includes AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud integrations.
- Monitors ECS tasks and Kubernetes pods.
- Free plan supports five hosts total.
What to know first
- Free plan retains data for one day.
- Free plan allows only 10 monitoring rules.
- Standard-plan technical support is email-only.
- Free support contact is limited to business-day hours.
Tencent Cloud Monitor: what it does well
Alternatives to Mackerel Alternatives to Tencent Cloud Monitor The whole list