Side by side
Lynk vs Oxford Abstracts
Both stand on call for papers software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Lynk connects paper handling, peer review, decisions, revisions, and session scheduling in a conference workflow. Submitting, reviewing, and chairing remain free, while publishing after the first conference is paid.
Visit Lynk
Free plan Web
Oxford Abstracts combines submission and review workflows with tools for running conference programs and event activities. The free Basic plan covers core management; paid event plans add reporting and conference features.
Visit Oxford AbstractsThe facts
| Lynk | Oxford Abstracts | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | See the plans |
| Plans published | 1 | 3 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | cmp.archeditech.org | oxfordabstracts.com |
| On call for papers software | #8 of 24 | #15 of 24 |
Lynk: what it does well
- Review forms support scales, yes-or-no, and free-text criteria.
- Double-blind review is available.
- PDF and DOCX uploads up to 100 MB.
- Available in English, French, and Arabic.
- First published conference is free.
What to know first
- Publishing a conference costs after the first one.
- Web is the only listed platform.
Oxford Abstracts: what it does well
- Free Basic plan includes unlimited submissions.
- Reviewer progress can be tracked.
- Forms and scheduled emails are customisable.
- Ticketing integrates with Stripe and PayPal.
- Programs are accessible from any device.
What to know first
- Abstract Management costs $890, paid once.
- Conference plans cost $2,290, paid once.
- Conference data is stored for at least a year unless the event is deleted.
Alternatives to Lynk Alternatives to Oxford Abstracts The whole list