Side by side
LuxMark vs SPECviewperf
Both stand on pc benchmark tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Choose LuxMark if you need a free benchmark for rendering workloads across GPU, CPU, or hybrid systems, with custom profiles and automation. Look elsewhere if you need a general-purpose system benchmark rather than rendering-focused tests.
Visit LuxMark Free plan LinuxWindows
Visit SPECviewperf The facts
| LuxMark | SPECviewperf | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Commercial license: $2,500, paid once |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | luxcorerender.org | gwpg.spec.org |
| On pc benchmark tools | #4 of 70 | #8 of 70 |
LuxMark: what it does well
- Benchmarks GPU, CPU, and hybrid rendering workloads.
- Includes path tracing and bidirectional path tracing.
- Offers a hardware stress mode for reliability checks.
- Supports custom profiles and command-line automation.
- Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux.
What to know first
- Focused on rendering workloads and related stress testing.
- The latest release listed is v3.1; v4.0alpha1 is a pre-release.
SPECviewperf: what it does well
Alternatives to LuxMark Alternatives to SPECviewperf The whole list