Side by side

LTX Video vs Wan

Both stand on image-to-video generators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Choose Wan if you want an open source, self-hosted video model suite with multiple generation and editing tasks, and can meet its setup and hardware requirements. Look elsewhere if you need a hosted service or higher resolution from the T2V-1.3B model.

Visit Wan

The facts

	LTX Video	Wan
Free plan	Not published	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	Linux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid plan	Not published	Not published
Plans published	None	None
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	ltx.video	github.com
On image-to-video generators	#23 of 23	#19 of 23

LTX Video: what it does well

Wan: what it does well

Supports text-to-video, image-to-video, editing, text-to-image, and video-to-audio.
Can generate Chinese and English text within videos.
T2V-14B supports output up to 720P.
Open source under Apache-2.0; commercial use is permitted.
Integrates with Diffusers and ComfyUI.

What to know first

T2V-1.3B requires 8.19 GB of VRAM.
T2V-1.3B supports 480P; its 720P results are less stable.
The quickstart requires PyTorch 2.4.0 or later.

Alternatives to LTX Video Alternatives to Wan The whole list