Side by side
LinkerFlow vs LinkStorm
Both stand on internal linking tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
LinkerFlow pairs reviewable internal-link suggestions with site crawling and broken-link checks. The Single plan is limited to 500 pages, while multilingual coverage requires the higher listed plan.
Visit LinkerFlow Free trial ExtensionWeb
LinkStorm combines link suggestions, audits, automatic linking, and Search Console data. Its quotas and English-only scope are important considerations when planning site analysis.
Visit LinkStormThe facts
| LinkerFlow | LinkStorm | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Extension, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Single: $29 a month | Small: $30 a month |
| Plans published | 3 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | linkerflow.io | linkstorm.io |
| On internal linking tools | #22 of 24 | #18 of 24 |
LinkerFlow: what it does well
- Reviews show source, target, anchor text, and context
- Crawls weekly for opportunities and broken links
- Free tools check orphan and dead-end pages
- Published links remain after cancellation
What to know first
- Paid plans start at $29 a month
- Plans have a 500-page maximum
- Framer support is still in preparation
LinkStorm: what it does well
- AI link suggestions from two methods
- Audits broken links and redirects
- Google Search Console integration
- Automatic links can be reviewed
- Supports JavaScript-heavy sites
What to know first
- English content only
- Best suited to pages with 500 words
- Monthly credits limit analysis
- No free plan
Alternatives to LinkerFlow Alternatives to LinkStorm The whole list