FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Lemuroid vs Mednafen

Both stand on turbografx-16 emulators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Lemuroid

Free plan Android

Lemuroid offers library organization, multiple control options, and several save methods at no cost. Users need their own game files, and performance varies by device, game, system, and settings.

Visit Lemuroid

Mednafen

Free plan LinuxWindows

Mednafen combines support for multiple systems with save, rewind, and capture features. Note its command-line approach, disc-image requirements, and warnings about untrusted save states.

Visit Mednafen

The facts

LemuroidMednafen
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroidLinux, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestNot published
Plans published1None
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitelemuroidemulator.commednafen.github.io
On turbografx-16 emulators#14 of 33#18 of 33

Lemuroid: what it does well

  • Free and open source
  • Library organizes supported games with artwork and metadata
  • Supports touch controls, gamepads, and local multiplayer
  • Includes quick states and automatic state restoration
  • No ads

What to know first

  • Does not include games or firmware
  • Users must provide legally obtained files
  • Newer systems generally need more capable hardware
  • No netplay

Mednafen: what it does well

  • Supports systems including NES, SNES, and PlayStation.
  • Offers save states and real-time rewinding.
  • Can record QuickTime movies and WAV sound.
  • Input mapping supports keyboards and joysticks.
  • Free and distributed under the GNU GPLv2.

What to know first

  • Command-line-driven rather than described as graphical.
  • Physical CD support was removed in version 0.9.38.
  • Network play requires an external dedicated server.
  • Untrusted save states may pose security risks.

Alternatives to Lemuroid Alternatives to Mednafen The whole list