Side by side
LASER AI vs SWIFT-Active Screener
Both stand on ai literature review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free trial AndroidiPhoneWeb
LASER AI combines review screening, extraction, collaboration, and audit history in a web service. Its annual per-user and one-time per-project plans place it in a paid research-tool category.
Visit LASER AI Paid Web
SWIFT-Active Screener focuses on collaborative, model-assisted document screening for review projects. Its browser delivery and import/export support fit teams, while pricing and the delayed progress graph are practical considerations.
Visit SWIFT-Active ScreenerThe facts
| LASER AI | SWIFT-Active Screener | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | A free trial | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Android, iPhone, Web | Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Per user: $3,000 a year | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 3 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | laser.ai | sciome.com |
| On ai literature review software | #27 of 38 | #37 of 38 |
LASER AI: what it does well
- Supports screening and systematic review workflows
- Links extraction suggestions to PDF sources
- Extracts tables using custom mappings
- Keeps a record of review changes
- Exports RIS, CSV, Word, and PDF
What to know first
- No free plan
- Starts at 3000.00 USD
- Article Galaxy retrieval needs a separate account
SWIFT-Active Screener: what it does well
- Active learning prioritizes likely relevant documents
- Separate model estimates remaining relevant articles
- Collaborative project and conflict tools
- Imports from major review databases
- Browser access requires no installation
What to know first
- Pricing requires contacting Sciome
- Progress graph needs about 10% screened
- Google Chrome is recommended
Alternatives to LASER AI Alternatives to SWIFT-Active Screener The whole list