Side by side
LabelLLM vs Prodigy
Both stand on ai data labeling tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
Visit LabelLLM Paid APILinuxMac+3
Prodigy combines broad annotation coverage with developer control over workflows, interfaces, storage, and deployment. Its paid licensing and technical setup make it a closer fit for teams with Python skills than for casual annotators.
Visit ProdigyThe facts
| LabelLLM | Prodigy | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | No |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | See the plans |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | prodigy.ai |
| On ai data labeling tools | #22 of 22 | #18 of 22 |
LabelLLM: what it does well
Prodigy: what it does well
- 23 interfaces cover varied annotation tasks.
- Custom workflows use Python recipes.
- Integrates with spaCy and major LLM APIs.
- Can run locally, air-gapped, or on-premise.
- Exports data as JSON and JSONL.
What to know first
- No free plan; Personal starts at $390, paid once.
- Company licensing requires packs of five seats.
- Hosted trials are not offered to individuals.
- Setup assumes Python and command-line familiarity.
Alternatives to LabelLLM Alternatives to Prodigy The whole list