Side by side
Kube-OVN vs TP-Link Omada Cloud-Based Controller
Both stand on software-defined networking software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted
Kube-OVN offers network orchestration features for Kubernetes, including tenant VPCs and KubeVirt migration support. Check the project's stated exclusions before choosing it for OpenShift, managed cloud Kubernetes, or an all-in-one stack.
Visit Kube-OVN Free plan AndroidiPhoneWeb
Visit TP-Link Omada Cloud-Based Controller The facts
| Kube-OVN | TP-Link Omada Cloud-Based Controller | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Self-hosted | Android, iPhone, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | kubeovn.github.io | omadanetworks.com |
| On software-defined networking software | #3 of 26 | #7 of 26 |
Kube-OVN: what it does well
- Free under the Apache-2.0 license
- Supports separate tenant address spaces
- Supports KubeVirt live migration without network interruption
- Runs on x86_64 and arm64
- Documents integrations including Cilium and MetalLB
What to know first
- Project advises against use with OpenShift
- Project advises against public-cloud managed Kubernetes
- Not recommended for all-in-one networking and observability needs
TP-Link Omada Cloud-Based Controller: what it does well
Alternatives to Kube-OVN Alternatives to TP-Link Omada Cloud-Based Controller The whole list