Side by side
Kong Ingress Controller vs NetScaler Ingress Controller
Both stand on kubernetes ingress controllers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Linux
Visit Kong Ingress Controller Paid Self-hosted
NetScaler Ingress Controller offers broad protocol, topology, platform, and security support for Kubernetes traffic management. It is best considered where NetScaler appliances and self-hosted operations fit the deployment environment.
Visit NetScaler Ingress ControllerThe facts
| Kong Ingress Controller | NetScaler Ingress Controller | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | developer.konghq.com | docs.netscaler.com |
| On kubernetes ingress controllers | #22 of 28 | #26 of 28 |
Kong Ingress Controller: what it does well
NetScaler Ingress Controller: what it does well
- Supports HTTP, HTTPS, TCP, TCP-SSL, and UDP
- Works with multiple Kubernetes platforms
- Deploys with YAML or Helm
- Supports WAF and authentication policies
- Prometheus and Grafana monitoring integration
What to know first
- Pricing is available only on request
- No free plan
- Requires self-hosted deployment
- CPX licensing uses an ADM license server
Alternatives to Kong Ingress Controller Alternatives to NetScaler Ingress Controller The whole list