Side by side
KMouseTool vs Silktide Accessibility
Both stand on digital accessibility platforms. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Linux
Visit KMouseTool Paid ExtensionWeb
Silktide Accessibility pairs large-scale automated checks with human audits and services. Its CMS workflows and free browser extension add practical coverage, but automation does not identify every issue.
Visit Silktide AccessibilityThe facts
| KMouseTool | Silktide Accessibility | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux | Extension, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Silktide Accessibility |
| Website | apps.kde.org | silktide.com |
| On digital accessibility platforms | #16 of 16 | #12 of 16 |
KMouseTool: what it does well
Silktide Accessibility: what it does well
- Tests WCAG 2.2, 2.1, and 2.0
- Scans sites and logged-in journeys
- Integrates with many CMS platforms
- Free Chrome and Edge checker
- Includes manual audits and consultancy
What to know first
- Paid pricing is on request
- No free plan for the platform
- 24.5% of WCAG 2.2 AA needs manual testing
- Contracts generally require at least 12 months
Alternatives to KMouseTool Alternatives to Silktide Accessibility The whole list
