Side by side
Kiteworks Managed File Transfer vs Signiant Jet
Both stand on managed file transfer - enterprise software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid APISelf-hostedWeb+1
Consider Kiteworks when your organization needs managed transfers for sensitive data, with supported protocols, storage connections, and deployment choices. Enterprise includes unlimited users and a 16 TB maximum file size; Secure Managed File Transfer is an add-on. Pricing is available on request.
Visit Kiteworks Managed File Transfer Paid LinuxWebWindows
Visit Signiant Jet The facts
| Kiteworks Managed File Transfer | Signiant Jet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | No |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Self-hosted, Web, Windows | Linux, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Not published |
| Plans published | 1 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | kiteworks.com | signiant.com |
| On managed file transfer - enterprise software | #11 of 17 | #15 of 17 |
Kiteworks Managed File Transfer: what it does well
- Supports SFTP, FTPS, SMB, CIFS, and AS2.
- Connects to a range of cloud and file storage services.
- Resumes failed transfers from where they stopped.
- Offers on-premises, private cloud, hybrid, and FedRAMP deployment.
- Technical support is listed as available 24×7.
What to know first
- The product is paid, with pricing on request.
- Secure Managed File Transfer is listed as an Enterprise add-on.
- Enterprise lists a maximum file size of 16 terabytes.
Signiant Jet: what it does well
Alternatives to Kiteworks Managed File Transfer Alternatives to Signiant Jet The whole list