Side by side
juliaup vs rustup
Both stand on development environment managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
juliaup centralizes Julia installation and channel management across major desktop platforms. Users should choose a non-MSI Windows method when automatic updates matter and check Linux GUI requirements.
Visit juliaup Free plan LinuxMacWindows
rustup centralizes Rust installation, switching, updates, and target management across several systems. Nightly variability and extra cross-compilation requirements are important considerations.
Visit rustupThe facts
| juliaup | rustup | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | rust-lang.github.io |
| On development environment managers | #32 of 50 | #36 of 50 |
juliaup: what it does well
- Installs and manages specific Julia versions
- Supports stable, LTS, beta, and nightly channels
- Offers both CLI and graphical interfaces
- Manifest.toml version selection is available
- Documents GitHub Actions installation for CI
What to know first
- Manifest-based selection is disabled by default
- Windows MSI lacks automatic updater
- Linux GUI requires X11 or Wayland and OpenGL
- Linux requires glibc 2.28 or newer
rustup: what it does well
- Installs and updates official Rust channels
- Supports stable, beta, and nightly toolchains
- Project toolchain pinning
- Cross-compilation target installation
- Shell completions for four shells
What to know first
- Nightly components may be unavailable
- Cross-compilation may need extra tools
- Windows MSVC setup requires Visual Studio
- Third-party package issues go to maintainers
Alternatives to juliaup Alternatives to rustup The whole list