Side by side
jest-image-snapshot vs TestivAI OSS
Both stand on visual regression testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Self-hosted
Choose jest-image-snapshot if you use Jest and want to compare test images against stored baselines with adjustable thresholds and reviewable diffs. Look elsewhere if you need cross-browser capture or rely on officially supported TypeScript definitions.
Visit jest-image-snapshot Free plan Self-hosted
TestivAI OSS combines screenshot and DOM analysis with local storage and configurable reporting. Its experimental integrations are worth noting when choosing a workflow.
Visit TestivAI OSSThe facts
| jest-image-snapshot | TestivAI OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | testiv.ai |
| On visual regression testing software | #16 of 26 | #20 of 26 |
jest-image-snapshot: what it does well
- Stores a baseline image on the first run.
- Supports Pixelmatch and experimental SSIM comparisons.
- Sets sensitivity and failure thresholds by pixels or percentage.
- Creates horizontal or vertical diff layouts.
- Can print diffs in the console.
What to know first
- Jest versions below 20 are unsupported.
- SSIM comparison is described as experimental.
- TypeScript definitions are community maintained and unofficial.
- Cross-browser capture is not supported.
TestivAI OSS: what it does well
- Screenshots and DOM data stay stored locally
- No account or API key required
- Supports several testing frameworks and CI systems
- Teams can choose whether visual changes fail checks
What to know first
- Java Playwright adapter is experimental
- Witness CLI browser integration is experimental
Alternatives to jest-image-snapshot Alternatives to TestivAI OSS The whole list