Side by side
jest-axe vs Testaro
Both stand on accessibility testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
jest-axe adds configurable axe checks to Jest tests across several web frameworks. It should complement, rather than replace, assistive-technology checks and involvement of disabled users.
Visit jest-axe Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Testaro combines multiple accessibility and standards engines with flexible job execution and report formats. Its browser sandbox requirement and possible site blocking should be considered before deployment.
Visit TestaroThe facts
| jest-axe | Testaro | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | github.com |
| On accessibility testing software | #120 of 169 | #116 of 169 |
jest-axe: what it does well
- Free MIT-licensed package
- Runs accessibility checks in Jest
- CI/CD integration
- Configurable axe rules and impact levels
- WCAG 2.2 coverage
What to know first
- Color contrast checks disabled in JSDOM
- No manual review tools
- No remediation guidance
- Requires Node.js 22.13.0 or later
Testaro: what it does well
- Free and MIT-licensed
- Combines many rule engines and built-in tests
- Native or standardized report formats
- Single-job and daemon execution modes
- Programmatic doJob integration
What to know first
- Requires Node.js 22.12 or later
- Hosts must permit sandboxed browsers
- Some sites can prevent automated testing
Alternatives to jest-axe Alternatives to Testaro The whole list