Side by side
Jamie vs Millet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
Choose Jamie if you want meeting transcripts, summaries and action items across supported online platforms, particularly if you need transcription in one of its 99 languages. Free is suited to shorter meetings and a modest note volume; Plus or Pro raises those limits. Pro is the option for unlimited monthly AI notes, with meetings capped at five hours.
Visit Jamie Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit MilletThe facts
| Jamie | Millet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Plus: €21 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Jamie | Not published |
| Website | meetjamie.ai | github.com |
| On ai meeting assistants | #34 of 82 | #55 of 82 |
Jamie: what it does well
- Transcribes meetings in 99 languages.
- Produces summaries and action items.
- Captures meetings on desktop across several online platforms.
- Calendar integrations are available.
- Pro includes unlimited AI notes per month.
What to know first
- Free limits meetings to 30 minutes.
- Free includes 10 AI notes per month.
- The listed access platform is web, with desktop meeting capture.
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token