Side by side
izartu vs Saved.io
Both stand on bookmark managers. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Self-hostedWeb
izartu provides a small, tag-centered bookmark core with self-hosting and public browsing controls. Its unreleased status and stated rough edges make it better suited to users willing to manage an evolving project.
Visit izartu Free trial APIWeb
Saved.io focuses on cross-platform bookmark storage with multiple organization and integration options. The yearly and one-time plans both include a 7-day trial, while users needing full-text search will not find that capability listed.
Visit Saved.ioThe facts
| izartu | Saved.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted, Web | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Yearly: $16 a year |
| Plans published | None | 2 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | izartu.org | saved.io |
| On bookmark managers | #41 of 43 | #37 of 43 |
izartu: what it does well
- Private bookmarks by default
- Automatic tag cleanup and deduplication
- Self-hosted deployment options
- Open-source GNU AGPLv3 license
- Public feed filtering by user or tags
What to know first
- No published release yet
- Project warns of breaking changes
- Non-Docker setup requires MySQL 8.4
- Accounts are created from command line
Saved.io: what it does well
- Cloud access across devices and browsers
- Lists and hashtag-based organization
- API supports bookmark management
- MCP server and save webhooks
- Unlimited bookmarks subject to fair use
What to know first
- No free plan
- Full-text search is unavailable
- Some sites may block title fetching
- Fair-use and rate limits apply
Alternatives to izartu Alternatives to Saved.io The whole list