FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Iron Bank Registry1 vs Kheeper

Both stand on container registries. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Iron Bank Registry1

Free plan Web

Iron Bank provides a free path to hardened container images with associated security artifacts and risk information. Account access, the required hardening pipeline, and separate deployment responsibilities are important constraints to account for.

Visit Iron Bank Registry1

Kheeper

Free plan LinuxMacWeb

Kheeper combines a Bootc image registry with host registration and per-host storage. Check the AWS region restriction and S3 compatibility limitation before adopting its cloud workflows.

Visit Kheeper

The facts

Iron Bank Registry1Kheeper
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWebLinux, Mac, Web
Lowest paid planFree or on requestSee the plans
Plans published11
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteregistry1.dso.milkheeper.com
On container registries#18 of 60#14 of 60

Iron Bank Registry1: what it does well

  • Free to contributors and users.
  • Images are rebuilt every 24 hours.
  • Provides vulnerability findings and risk assessment information.
  • Hosted containers can include SBOMs and scan artifacts.

What to know first

  • An account is required to pull images.
  • External images must pass through the hardening pipeline.
  • Registry1 does not run or automatically deploy images.
  • Hardened containers lack a Certificate to Field or Authority to Operate.

Kheeper: what it does well

  • Purpose-built for Bootc
  • Templates configure images per host
  • Optional JSON Schema validation
  • GCP and AWS host registration
  • Free plan available

What to know first

  • AWS launches currently limited to us-east-2
  • Object store is not S3-compatible
  • Usage-based plan costs $5, paid once
  • Cloud and storage workflows require configuration

Alternatives to Iron Bank Registry1 Alternatives to Kheeper The whole list