Side by side
Infrared vs Infrarust
Both stand on minecraft server proxy software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan APILinuxMac+2
Infrared offers proxy routing, configurable bot checks and operational metrics for self-hosted Minecraft deployments. Review the Redis/API trade-off and Linux requirements before setting up the configuration you need.
Visit Infrared
Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+1
Visit Infrarust The facts
| Infrared | Infrarust | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows | API, Linux, Self-hosted, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | github.com | infrarust.dev |
| On minecraft server proxy software | #7 of 21 | #3 of 21 |
Infrared: what it does well
- Free and open source under Apache License 2.0
- Bot checks include several validation methods
- Prometheus exporter reports proxy metrics
- Supports IPv4 and IPv6
- Optional live upgrades can preserve connections
What to know first
- Redis-based proxy configuration disables the built-in API
- Recommended mitigation setup requires Linux kernel 5.8 or later
- Live upgrades require systemd
Infrarust: what it does well
Alternatives to Infrared Alternatives to Infrarust The whole list