Side by side

Indusface WAS vs Zimperium zScan

Both stand on mobile application security testing software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Indusface WAS

Free trial Web

Indusface WAS combines automated scanning with optional manual penetration testing and remediation guidance. Advance has a 14-day trial, while higher-tier pricing is custom.

Visit Indusface WAS

Choose zScan if your team needs mobile app security analysis, protection checks, and pipeline integration. Its 30-day trial includes unlimited scans, but account access requires approval and ongoing pricing is available on request.

Visit Zimperium zScan

The facts

	Indusface WAS	Zimperium zScan
Free plan	A free trial	A free trial
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	Android, API, iPhone, Web
Lowest paid plan	Advance: $599 a year	Not published
Plans published	4	None
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	indusface.com	zimperium.com
On mobile application security testing software	#12 of 21	#16 of 21

Indusface WAS: what it does well

Covers OWASP Top 10, SANS Top 25, and zero-day vulnerabilities
Manual testing can identify business logic vulnerabilities
Findings include remediation guidance and screenshot walkthroughs
Can trigger scans on new CI/CD builds
Offers a 14-day free trial on Advance

What to know first

No free plan is listed
Advance is priced per app each month
Premium and MSSP Edition require custom pricing

Zimperium zScan: what it does well

Accepts IPA, APK, AAB files, or an App Store URL.
Combines static, dynamic, and interactive scanning.
AI Insights provides guidance and configuration fixes.
Checks third-party components, SDKs, and SBOMs.
Offers a 30-day trial with unlimited mobile app scans.

What to know first

No free plan is offered.
Paid pricing is available on request.
Trial account access is provided after approval.

Alternatives to Indusface WAS Alternatives to Zimperium zScan The whole list