IDmelon vs WiKID
| IDmelon | WiKID | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, extension, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | hybrid | self_hosted |
| Supported factors | FIDO2 passkeys/security keys; smartphones; contactless cards and ID badges; NFC cards; fingerprints; Face ID/biometrics; SMS OTP; email OTP; phone-call verification | PIN and WiKID software token/device |
| App integration methods | SAML 2.0; OIDC; REST API; existing identity-provider integration; custom SAML application integration | RADIUS, LDAP, TACACS+, SAML, native Active Directory, API/network clients |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | — |
| Device trust controls | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Freedom251, WiKID scores higher on our published basis.