FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Icinga vs lm-sensors

Both stand on hardware monitoring software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Icinga

Free plan APILinuxSelf-hosted+2

Icinga offers self-hosted monitoring with a free edition and options for distributed setups, certificate monitoring, and integrations. Teams should account for its rolling update policy and package subscription requirements.

Visit Icinga

lm-sensors

Free plan LinuxSelf-hosted

lm-sensors provides several ways to expose Linux hardware readings, from command-line output to libraries and RRD feeds. Its usefulness depends on the monitoring chips and drivers available on the target system.

Visit lm-sensors

The facts

Icingalm-sensors
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAPI, Linux, Self-hosted, Web, WindowsLinux, Self-hosted
Lowest paid planModule Subscription: $2,000 a yearFree or on request
Plans published41
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteicinga.comgithub.com
On hardware monitoring software#9 of 59#34 of 59

Icinga: what it does well

  • Free edition includes unlimited hosts and services.
  • Supports distributed environments and clustering.
  • Can alert on certificates nearing expiry.
  • Integrates with infrastructure and incident-management tools.

What to know first

  • Self-hosted deployment is required.
  • Older versions receive no maintenance under its rolling support model.
  • Some installation packages require a paid subscription.

lm-sensors: what it does well

  • Free Linux and self-hosted package
  • Reports temperatures, fan speeds, and voltages
  • Hardware detection recommends kernel modules
  • sensord logs readings and problems
  • Library supports application integration

What to know first

  • No graphical monitoring interface
  • No remote monitoring
  • Requires compatible kernel drivers
  • May not help some laptops

Alternatives to Icinga Alternatives to lm-sensors The whole list