Side by side

Hound vs Rami Code Review

Both stand on code review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Hound

Free plan Web

Choose Hound if your team works with GitHub and wants automated style and code-quality comments with customizable guides. The free option is for public repositories; teams reviewing private repositories need a paid plan with a review cap.

Visit Hound

Rami Code Review

Free plan APIWeb

Rami automates GitHub pull request reviews while leaving code changes and merge decisions to users. Consider its review quotas, plan features, and third-party data processing when deciding whether it fits your workflow.

Visit Rami Code Review

The facts

	Hound	Rami Code Review
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Web	API, Web
Lowest paid plan	Chihuahua: $29 a month	Pro: $7 a month
Plans published	5	8
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	houndci.com	rami.reviews
On code review software	#28 of 50	#32 of 50

Hound: what it does well

Comments on pull requests when opened or updated.
Supports twelve listed programming and markup languages.
Offers default and customizable style guides.
Free plan covers public repositories.
GitHub App places comments directly in pull requests.

What to know first

The free plan is limited to public repositories.
Paid plans cap private reviews at 50, 300, 1,000, or 3,000.
GitHub is the listed code host.

Rami Code Review: what it does well

Reviews for security, bugs, and code quality
Re-reviews after pushes without extra quota
Supports evidence-based rebuttals
Repository settings control review behavior
Free plan includes 20 reviews per month

What to know first

Pull request data goes to third-party LLM providers
Only accesses repositories with its GitHub App installed
Rami does not change code
Merge gates require Pro+ or Team+

Alternatives to Hound Alternatives to Rami Code Review The whole list