Side by side
Hightail vs Plik
Both stand on file transfer services. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan API
Choose Hightail if you need file sharing with a free plan, download tracking, and paid options for larger files. Lite is limited to 100MB files and 2GB storage; teams needing higher limits can consider paid plans, which have annual billing and specified user requirements.
Visit Hightail Free plan APILinuxMac+3
Plik combines temporary sharing, configurable storage, authentication, encryption, and deployment choices in a free self-hosted project. Its hosting responsibility and documented MIME-detection limitation should be considered first.
Visit PlikThe facts
| Hightail | Plik | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | API | API, Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | See the plans | Not published |
| Plans published | 4 | None |
| Maker | Hightail | Not published |
| Website | hightail.com | root-gg.github.io |
| On file transfer services | #31 of 105 | #35 of 105 |
Hightail: what it does well
- Free Lite plan includes 2GB of storage.
- Download tracking is available.
- API access is available.
- Custom branding is available.
- A desktop app is available.
What to know first
- Lite limits files to 100MB.
- Lite sent files expire after seven days.
- Teams costs $24 a month, billed annually.
- Business requires three or more users.
Plik: what it does well
- Self-hosted file sharing
- Provides web, API, and CLI access
- Supports multiple storage backends
- Offers client-side age encryption
- Configurable expiration and one-shot downloads
What to know first
- Requires self-hosted deployment
- Server MIME detection can misidentify Office files
- No desktop app
Alternatives to Hightail Alternatives to Plik The whole list