Side by side
HAWC vs ReviewAid
Both stand on systematic review software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan Web
HAWC brings assessment data, collaboration, and evidence synthesis into a browser-based system. Public viewing is open, while participating in ongoing EPA assessments requires approved account access.
Visit HAWC Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2
ReviewAid provides configurable screening and extraction assistance, with confidence flags and several export formats. Its maker explicitly positions it as a supplement to manual review, and submissions have article limits.
Visit ReviewAidThe facts
| HAWC | ReviewAid | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Web | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Free or on request | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 1 | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hawc.epa.gov | reviewaid.github.io |
| On systematic review software | #15 of 30 | #11 of 30 |
HAWC: what it does well
- Free to use.
- Supports human, animal, and in vitro evidence assessment.
- Role-based access for assessment teams.
- Exports datasets to Excel and figures to PDF or other formats.
- Published content is viewable without an account.
What to know first
- Ongoing collaboration requires an account and approved access.
- Visualizations are selected by the chemical project manager.
- Internet Explorer functionality errors have been reported.
ReviewAid: what it does well
- Classifies papers against user-provided PICO criteria.
- Users define the fields for data extraction.
- Exports results as CSV, XLSX, or DOCX.
- Local Ollama keeps paper text on the machine.
What to know first
- Full-text screening is limited to 10 articles per submission.
- Extraction is limited to 20 articles per submission.
- The hosted app may take about 30 seconds to initialize.
Alternatives to HAWC Alternatives to ReviewAid The whole list