Side by side
@hapi/lab vs Zora
Both stand on javascript testing frameworks. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid
@hapi/lab offers test organization, hooks, coverage, and multiple reporting formats for Node.js projects. Its simple execution design and lack of parallel execution are worth considering.
Visit @hapi/lab Free plan APILinuxWeb
Choose Zora if you want JavaScript tests that can run across Node.js, Deno, and browsers without a required test runner. Look elsewhere if you need a published assertion library bundled among the listed related projects; zora-assert is unpublished.
Visit ZoraThe facts
| @hapi/lab | Zora | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | API, Linux, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hapi.dev | github.com |
| On javascript testing frameworks | #22 of 23 | #18 of 23 |
@hapi/lab: what it does well
- Supports BDD and TDD test interfaces
- Can enforce a minimum coverage threshold
- Includes TypeScript definitions
- Offers seven built-in report formats
What to know first
- Requires Node.js 16 or newer for versions 25 and 26
- Does not support parallel execution
Zora: what it does well
- Runs tests in Node.js, Deno, and browsers.
- Test programs do not require a specific test runner.
- Supports parallel execution.
- Includes reporter tools usable from a CLI.
- Free and MIT licensed.
What to know first
- The listed assertion library, zora-assert, is unpublished.
- The free plan has no free trial.
Alternatives to @hapi/lab Alternatives to Zora The whole list