Side by side
Hadrian vs RiskRecon
Both stand on security ratings software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Web
Hadrian combines continuous external exposure management with on-demand penetration testing. Its cloud deployment, integrations, and detailed validation outputs fit enterprise security operations, while pricing requires contacting the provider.
Visit Hadrian Free trial APIWeb
RiskRecon focuses on vendor exposure, asset attribution, and prioritized remediation, with assessment automation and API integration options. Its ratings reflect external posture, so they do not directly inspect internal systems.
Visit RiskReconThe facts
| Hadrian | RiskRecon | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | A free trial |
| Open source | Not published | No |
| Runs on | Web | API, Web |
| Lowest paid plan | Nova: €3,000, paid once | Free or on request |
| Plans published | 2 | 4 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hadrian.io | riskrecon.com |
| On security ratings software | #18 of 30 | #14 of 30 |
Hadrian: what it does well
- Continuously maps external attack surfaces
- Validates exposures with exploit evidence
- Integrates directly with major cloud providers
- Offers attack-path analysis and API access
- Nova includes full reporting
What to know first
- No free plan
- Atlas pricing is on request
- Nova costs €3,000 per test
- Nova timing depends on scope
RiskRecon: what it does well
- Continuously monitors third-party cyber risk.
- Prioritizes findings using severity and estimated asset value.
- Vendors can track remediation at no cost.
- Offers APIs for risk-data integrations.
- Trial includes Solutions Consulting access.
What to know first
- No ongoing free plan is listed.
- Ratings assess external systems, not internal systems directly.
- Subscription pricing is available on request.
Alternatives to Hadrian Alternatives to RiskRecon The whole list