Side by side
grpcmock vs sabledocs
Both stand on grpc tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Paid Self-hosted
grpcmock provides controls for simulating gRPC calls and checking how tests invoke them. Multithreaded test setups should account for its ThreadLocal configuration behavior.
Visit grpcmock Free plan LinuxMacWindows
sabledocs is a free, open-source option for generating customizable static contract documentation. Its workflow depends on a protoc-generated descriptor and Python 3.11 or later.
Visit sabledocsThe facts
| grpcmock | sabledocs | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Not published | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Self-hosted | Linux, Mac, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Free or on request |
| Plans published | None | 1 |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | grpcmock.org | markvincze.github.io |
| On grpc tools | #24 of 24 | #20 of 24 |
grpcmock: what it does well
- Configures stubs through a fluent Java API.
- Supports all four gRPC method styles.
- Verifies invocation counts, status, headers, and requests.
- Provides Spring Boot and JUnit 5 integrations.
What to know first
- Self-hosted deployment is required.
- Static configuration can cause UNIMPLEMENTED errors across threads.
sabledocs: what it does well
- Builds documentation for multiple packages together.
- Supports both Protobuf and gRPC contracts.
- Search is enabled by default.
- Jinja templates and configuration allow customization.
- Docker image includes protoc and Sabledocs.
What to know first
- Requires Python 3.11 or higher.
- Requires a binary descriptor generated with protoc.
- Comments require source information in the descriptor.
Alternatives to grpcmock Alternatives to sabledocs The whole list