FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

GroupPulse vs Qlicker

Both stand on audience response systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

GroupPulse

Free plan Web

GroupPulse focuses on live participation through browser-based polls, quizzes, questions, and updating visuals. Its free tier covers small sessions, while Pro at £3 a month removes session and participant limits and adds customization and exports.

Visit GroupPulse

Qlicker

Free plan Self-hostedWeb

Qlicker provides classroom polling and assessment tools without hardware clickers. Its self-hosting path is documented, but deployment requires specific environment settings and email configuration.

Visit Qlicker

The facts

GroupPulseQlicker
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onWebSelf-hosted, Web
Lowest paid planPro: £30 a yearFree or on request
Plans published41
MakerGroupPulseQlicker
Websitegroup-pulse.comqlicker.queensu.ca
On audience response systems#73 of 118#69 of 118

GroupPulse: what it does well

  • Supports polls, word clouds, scales, quizzes, and Q&A
  • Visualisations update as responses arrive
  • Participants join without downloading software
  • Organisers can apply logos, colours, and styling
  • Free plan includes two active sessions

What to know first

  • Free plan allows 15 participants per session
  • Free plan is limited to two active sessions
  • CSV export requires the Pro plan
  • Team plan costs £200 a year

Qlicker: what it does well

  • Free plan includes polling, quizzes, and practice
  • Mobile-capable web participation
  • Supports grade management and statistics
  • Self-hosting and Docker deployment documented
  • GPL-3.0 licensed source repository

What to know first

  • No slide integrations
  • Docker deployment requires ROOT_URL and MONGO_URL
  • MAIL_URL is needed for account email functions

Alternatives to GroupPulse Alternatives to Qlicker The whole list