Side by side
Granola vs Millet
Both stand on ai meeting assistants. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan WindowsMaciPhone+1
Granola covers meeting capture, transcription, and follow-up notes, with a free tier and paid options for unlimited history or organizational controls. The main plan differences are the history limit and the administrative features included.
Visit Granola Free plan LinuxMac
Millet combines desktop capture with transcription, structured meeting notes, and multiple export formats. Its Linux-first capture model and alpha status matter when choosing it, especially for users needing macOS capture or Windows support.
Visit MilletThe facts
| Granola | Millet | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Windows, Mac, iPhone, Android | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Business: $14 a month | Not published |
| Plans published | 3 | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | granola.ai | github.com |
| On ai meeting assistants | #9 of 82 | #55 of 82 |
Granola: what it does well
- Transcribes meetings in 32 languages.
- Creates summaries and action items.
- Supports five named meeting types or platforms.
- Free Basic plan includes meeting history.
- Enterprise includes single sign-on and admin controls.
What to know first
- Basic keeps only 30 days of meeting history.
- Business costs $14 per user per month.
- Enterprise costs $35 per user per month.
Millet: what it does well
- Free and open source
- Supports many meeting services
- Exports several text and document formats
- Offline transcription after downloads
- Offers local Ollama summaries
What to know first
- Windows is unsupported
- Alpha software
- Overlapping speech is handled poorly
- Diarization needs a Hugging Face token
Alternatives to Granola Alternatives to Millet The whole list