FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

Grain vs Harp

Both stand on static site generators. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Grain

Free plan LinuxMacWindows

Grain combines Groovy-based site generation with several markup formats, preview tools, themes, and asset-processing features. Its JDK requirement and Windows-specific command are important setup details.

Visit Grain

Harp

Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+2

Harp combines local serving, preprocessing, templating, and static compilation in one open-source tool. It is flexible for deployment and Express integration, but development changes require manual browser refreshes.

Visit Harp

The facts

GrainHarp
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onLinux, Mac, WindowsLinux, Mac, Self-hosted, Web, Windows
Lowest paid planNot publishedNot published
Plans publishedNoneNone
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websitegithub.comharp.sh
On static site generators#29 of 35#25 of 35

Grain: what it does well

  • Free plan and Apache 2.0 license
  • Runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows
  • Supports Markdown, reStructuredText, and AsciiDoctor
  • Local preview reloads website changes
  • Includes compression, minification, and Sass support

What to know first

  • Requires JDK 7 or later
  • Windows uses grainw instead of ./grainw

Harp: what it does well

  • Preprocesses several web source languages
  • No configuration file or build step required
  • Compiles deployable static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
  • Supports layouts, partials, and directory data
  • Can run as Express middleware

What to know first

  • Local development has no live reload
  • Basic Authentication is absent from compiled output
  • Requires Node.js and global npm installation

Alternatives to Grain Alternatives to Harp The whole list