Side by side
Go cover vs Tarpaulin
Both stand on test coverage tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit Go cover Free plan LinuxMacSelf-hosted+1
Tarpaulin offers Rust line coverage with configurable runs, varied report formats, and CI options. Users should account for its accuracy caveat and backend limitations.
Visit TarpaulinThe facts
| Go cover | Tarpaulin | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac, Self-hosted, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | go.dev | github.com |
| On test coverage tools | #24 of 27 | #20 of 27 |
Go cover: what it does well
Tarpaulin: what it does well
- Free and open source under two licenses.
- Reports coverage in five listed formats.
- Covers tests, doctests, benchmarks, examples, libraries, and binaries.
- Supports file filters and TOML configuration.
What to know first
- Branch coverage is not implemented.
- Default Linux Ptrace backend works only on x86_64.
- Coverage may have minor inaccuracies.
Alternatives to Go cover Alternatives to Tarpaulin The whole list