Side by side
GNU Make vs Please
Both stand on build automation software. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan LinuxMacWindows
Visit GNU Make Free plan LinuxMac
Please offers a code-defined, reproducible build workflow with caching, plugins, editor tooling, and CI guidance. Its native platform coverage and mobile-development limitation matter for some projects.
Visit PleaseThe facts
| GNU Make | Please | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Linux, Mac, Windows | Linux, Mac |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | gnu.org | please.build |
| On build automation software | #35 of 42 | #31 of 42 |
GNU Make: what it does well
Please: what it does well
- Hermetic steps support reproducible builds
- Caching and parallelism speed incremental work
- Plugins cover multiple languages and technologies
- Language server supports rich BUILD-file editing
- Integrates with GitHub Actions
What to know first
- Windows is not supported natively
- Remote execution is experimental
- FAQ notes less mobile-development support
Alternatives to GNU Make Alternatives to Please The whole list
