Side by side

Gefyra vs Toolbx

Both stand on container development environments. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

Gefyra

Paid ExtensionLinuxMac+1

Gefyra is designed for local Kubernetes development and controlled shared cluster access. Check its runtime, networking, and extension limitations before adopting it for a team workflow.

Visit Gefyra

Toolbx separates development tools from the host while retaining access to selected host resources. It fits Linux workflows that need reproducible container environments, but it is explicitly not a secure development environment.

Visit Toolbx

The facts

	Gefyra	Toolbx
Free plan	Not published	Yes
Open source	Not published	Not published
Runs on	Extension, Linux, Mac, Windows	Linux
Lowest paid plan	Not published	Free or on request
Plans published	None	1
Maker	Not published	Not published
Website	gefyra.dev	containertoolbx.org
On container development environments	#39 of 40	#35 of 40

Gefyra: what it does well

Runs local code against Kubernetes resources
Traffic bridge to local containers
Shared environments with limited access
WireGuard-encrypted client connection
Open-source project

What to know first

Requires Kubernetes and reachable UDP port 31820
Rootless Docker lacks required overlay networking
Docker extension lacks shared environments
Client files contain sensitive connection data

Toolbx: what it does well

Free, open-source Linux software
Separate `/usr` filesystems reduce host tool conflicts
Supports Arch, Fedora, RHEL, and Ubuntu environments
GNOME Builder and IDE integration
Installed by default on Fedora Silverblue and Workstation

What to know first

Makes no security promise beyond the host command line
Host user details are propagated into containers
SELinux label separation is disabled
Requires Podman 1.6.4 or later

Alternatives to Gefyra Alternatives to Toolbx The whole list