FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

FreeATS vs Loam

Both stand on applicant tracking systems. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

FreeATS

Free plan ExtensionSelf-hostedWeb

FreeATS provides core applicant tracking with customizable workflows, candidate management, and a free cloud tier. Check position limits, trial terms, and compliance requirements before adopting it.

Visit FreeATS

Loam

Free plan Web

Choose Loam if your team wants a web-based hiring platform with a career site, resume parsing, and workflow automation. Solo offers a free entry point, while paid plans raise job, team, and AI usage limits. Teams needing more than 10 published jobs or 10 team members exceed the capacities of the listed plans.

Visit Loam

The facts

FreeATSLoam
Free planYesYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onExtension, Self-hosted, WebWeb
Lowest paid planPro: $99 a monthSeed: $59 a month
Plans published33
MakerFreeATSLoam
Websitefreeats.comhireloam.com
On applicant tracking systems#19 of 233#15 of 233

FreeATS: what it does well

  • Open-source recruiting system
  • Custom stages, roles, and scorecards
  • LinkedIn profile import
  • Email and file synchronization
  • Forever-free cloud plan

What to know first

  • Free plan allows three open positions
  • Free trial lasts seven days
  • Self-hosting currently supports PostgreSQL only
  • Not tailored to HIPAA or FISMA

Loam: what it does well

  • Includes a career site and resume parsing.
  • Workflow automation is included.
  • Free Solo plan supports one published job.
  • Seed allows unlimited AI-enhanced applications.
  • Startup supports 10 published jobs and 10 team members.

What to know first

  • Solo is limited to one published job and two team members.
  • Solo caps AI-enhanced applications at 100 per month.
  • Seed costs $59 a month.
  • Startup costs $129 a month.

Alternatives to FreeATS Alternatives to Loam The whole list