FREEDOM251

Freedom251 › Compare

Side by side

FrameFlow vs Shinken

Both stand on network monitoring. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.

FrameFlow

Free trial AndroidiPhoneWeb+1

FrameFlow combines infrastructure monitoring, alert automation, and cloud event coverage in an agentless deployment. Confirm endpoint capacity and Windows requirements before evaluating its quoted plans.

Visit FrameFlow

Shinken

Free plan LinuxSelf-hostedWindows

Shinken provides a scalable, self-hosted monitoring framework with Nagios compatibility and distributed daemons. Its main limitation is that check plugins must be obtained separately or created.

Visit Shinken

The facts

FrameFlowShinken
Free planA free trialYes
Open sourceNot publishedNot published
Runs onAndroid, iPhone, Web, WindowsLinux, Self-hosted, Windows
Lowest paid planFree or on requestNot published
Plans published4None
MakerNot publishedNot published
Websiteframeflow.comshinken-monitoring.org
On network monitoring#33 of 55#29 of 55

FrameFlow: what it does well

  • Monitors servers, networks, cloud, and power systems
  • Custom dashboards include status colors and diagrams
  • Alerts support Slack, Teams, PagerDuty, email, and SMS
  • Agentless on-premises deployment
  • 30-day trial includes all features

What to know first

  • No free plan
  • Pricing is available only on request
  • Listed device limit is 25 devices
  • Trial download requires Windows 2008 R2 or later

Shinken: what it does well

  • Free under the GNU Affero General Public License
  • Reuses Nagios configurations and plugins
  • Daemon architecture supports load distribution
  • Spare daemons provide high availability
  • Supports broad monitoring protocols and packs

What to know first

  • Check plugins are not included
  • Requires self-hosted installation
  • Configuration and setup are user-managed
  • Support uses a GitHub issue list

Alternatives to FrameFlow Alternatives to Shinken The whole list