Frama-C vs Isabelle
| Frama-C | Isabelle | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Verification method | hybrid | deductive |
| Supported formalisms | contracts | theorem-proving |
| Counterexamples | Yes | Yes |
| Input languages | C, ACSL | Isabelle/Isar, Isabelle/Pure, ML; executable specifications can generate SML, OCaml, Haskell, and Scala |
| Deployment | self-hosted | self-hosted |
| Proof artifacts | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Formal Verification Tools. On Freedom251, Frama-C scores higher on our published basis.