FOSSA vs ScanCode.io
| FOSSA | ScanCode.io | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $168392.50/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web | Web, Linux, macOS, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript/TypeScript, Java/Kotlin, Python, Go, Ruby, Rust, Clojure, Elixir, iOS/Objective-C/Swift, .NET, PHP, Dart, Erlang, Fortran, Haskell, Perl | npm, PyPI, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, Cargo, Composer, Conda, Docker; Java, Scala, Kotlin, Groovy, Clojure, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Python, Debian |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | — |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Monitored projects | 10 projects | — |
| Deployment options | hybrid | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Open Source License Compliance Software. On Freedom251, FOSSA scores higher on our published basis.