Side by side
fortran-src vs OpenText Fortify SAST
Both stand on static analysis tools. Which one you can start free with, which one lets you read the code, and what each costs once you pay.
Free plan
Visit fortran-src Paid LinuxMacWeb+1
Choose OpenText Fortify SAST if your team needs static analysis across source code, bytecode, or binaries, with development workflow support and custom rules. Look elsewhere if you need published pricing or a free option.
Visit OpenText Fortify SASTThe facts
| fortran-src | OpenText Fortify SAST | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Not published |
| Open source | Not published | Not published |
| Runs on | Not published | Linux, Mac, Web, Windows |
| Lowest paid plan | Not published | Not published |
| Plans published | None | None |
| Maker | Not published | Not published |
| Website | hackage.haskell.org | opentext.com |
| On static analysis tools | #28 of 38 | #32 of 38 |
fortran-src: what it does well
OpenText Fortify SAST: what it does well
- Analyzes source code, bytecode, and binaries.
- Supports pull request scans.
- Offers IDE and CI/CD integration.
- Allows custom security rules.
- Includes automated fixes.
What to know first
- It is a paid product.
- Pricing is available on request.
Alternatives to fortran-src Alternatives to OpenText Fortify SAST The whole list